Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 6:04 pm by Lara
  Not only did Gil have the pleasure of announcing two awesome speakers, but he also announced the launch of Natural Logic and Tripost Software’s new on-demand e-learning library, SUSTAINABILITY IN PRACTICE™. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am by Matthew Parham
 But the grievances themselves indicated on their face that they were re-submissions of grievances previously filed, and the inmate alleged the grievance system was made unavailable to him by officers' preventing the filing of grievances. [read post]
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
Petitioner challenged the County’s use of the commonsense exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)), and the existing facilities exemption (CEQA Guidelines §15301) to support its condemnation proceedings to acquire fee simple title to three sites that the County currently leases and uses for landfills and the County’s continued operation of the landfills. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm by Carrie Cordero
The Brennan Center appears to miss this point, as the report states: With the exception of e-mails stored in the United States, the new law [the FISA Amendments Act] had no impact on the government’s ability to collect the communications of foreigners with other foreigners. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
L’audience ne doit porter que sur une question limitée. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
It reasoned that “[e]videntiary support for the conclu-sion that remedial action is warranted becomes crucial when the re-medial program is challenged in court by nonminority employees. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
The appellants, a telecommunication provider's officers and directors, successfully argued that the investors did not prove loss causation between the provider's allegedly false statements and the loss to the investors from a lower stock price.According to the majority opinion, "[e]ssentially, we require plaintiffs to establish loss causation in order to trigger the fraud-on-the-market presumption. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 2:50 pm
[REVISION: OK, as it turns out, PG&E is not an acquiescence, although listed as such on the SG's webstie. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:53 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
String Theory Section 5.b. does a lot of good things, but I believe it could use some clarification. [read post]