Search for: "IN RE B E S" Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 4:19 pm by Dean Gonsowski
” In terms of the remedy for the government’s failure, she did cut them some slack:  “Because no metadata was specifically requested in Plaintiffs’ July 23 e-mail, and because this is an issue of first impression, I will not require Defendants to re-produce all of the records with metadata. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:47 am by admin
Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1833 (e) prohibits Medicare payment for any claim which lacks the necessary information to process the claim. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
We remain mindful, however, that "'[e]quivalence, in the patent law, is not the prisoner of a formula and is not an absolute to be considered in a vacuum.'" Warner-Jenkinson, 520 U.S. at 24-25 (quoting Graver Tank, 339 U.S. at 609). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm by K&L Gates
P. 37(e)) in light of certain “actions and words attributable to the third-party defendant after it filed suit, including throwing the laptop off the building; running over the laptop with a vehicle; and stating ‘[I]f this gets us into trouble, I hope we’re prison buddies'” – activities which “unquestionably demonstrate bad faith and a general disregard for the judicial process. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:20 pm by David Lat
[N]ow, affidavits filed in a separate lawsuit reveal the identity of the previously unnamed executive: Roger E. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:57 am by Kyle Fleming
  It failed to do it to the court’s satisfication. 2011-1214 Order 2 [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 am by admin
Il navigua vers le nord jusqu’à la rivière St.Johns, près de l’actuelle ville de Jacksonville. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
  J’annonçais le 5 janvier que le Sénat avait voté la modification des règles en matière de classement des inventions de salariés. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:36 am by Sheppard Mullin
Nog's president and Rule 30(b)(6) designee testified that Nog purchased roughly $454 worth of Aspartame from Defendant NutraSweet in 1994 and 1995. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:58 am by admin
 » Les québécois et les montréalais, en habitués qu’ils sont, prennent très rapidement la 95 Highway qui longe toute la côte Est jusqu’à Miami. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am by Maria Roche
 One third of BME females report more than 91% of their practice being publicly funded [§81(e)]. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
There’s no point in making a procedural argument if you’re going to lose on the substantive point once the Board reads the reference. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:14 am by Broc Romanek
The Court held that the imprecision of a potential post-closing monetary remedy weighed in favor of injunctive relief, as did the powerful defenses available to the director defendants (including exculpation under Section 102(b)(7) and reliance on the advice of experts selected with reasonable care under Section 141(e) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
Le requérant aurait aussi pu prévoir un système électronique rempli par la première personne, et auquel la seconde personne, chargée de la contre-vérification, aurait eu accès. [read post]