Search for: "In Re He"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 136,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 4:37 am
You breathe, but you're not conscious of breathing. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:56 am
Cabbie: So you’re a Labour man then? [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 5:03 pm
Tell him you ´re representing a cop, and suddenly he gets righteous: "What's the matter with you? [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:00 am
He’s owned the home for 2.5 years and we’re trying to figure out if he’ll have to repay the $8,000 tax credit he received as a first time homebuyer. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:20 am
Even though I can never figure out what he's saying. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
But even with that uncertainty, there have been suggestions that, should the current Senate decide not to convict President Trump, if he were re-elected in 2020 he would be subject to (re)impeachment and (re)trial by a new Senate, because the double jeopardy protections that prevent retrial of criminal defendants do not apply to impeachment. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 12:39 pm
In In re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:21 pm
Perhaps they're right.On a tip from Bob, we have this story from the land of meatballs:"A Swedish man was forced to have his penis amputated after waiting more than a year to learn he had cancer. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
He could always come back if he lost. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:49 am
You could say he’s talking about loyalty or integrity; I’ve chosen to say he’s talking about trust. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:49 pm
And an Emperor die by the scratch of comb, whilst he was combing his head? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
Griffin came right to the point: “Charlie,” he said, according to documents Amaranth filed in a recent lawsuit, “what can we do, and how can we help? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:51 am
He settled his rather frivolous claim for about 1 fifth of of what he was initially asking for. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:38 pm
Following through on changes announced late last month, upon being sworn in today House Republicans re-named the House Committee on Education and Labor. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm
I’m delighted to report that Richard Re will be guest-blogging next week about the exclusionary rule, and in particular about his forthcoming Harvard Law Review article on the subject, The Due Process Exclusionary Rule. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
They’re not liable for damages the way a private company would be. . . . [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 2:08 am
Nominal damages are appropriate in a Section 1983 case if the plaintiff establishes a violation of a fundamental constitutional right, even if he cannot prove actual injury sufficient to entitle him to compensatory damages. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 6:59 am
In fact, Quinn explicitly stated that “the only relief [he] seeks is a full 2 level reduction in his crack sentence pursuant to Amendment 706,” and contrasts his request with the arguments of defendants in other cases who requested outside-Guidelines sentences at the modification stage. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:04 am
" Reported the Express News: Democratic primary foe Anthony Zamora cited the 4th Court ruling as the reason he ran against Roman, and the judge countered that relying on the reversal was premature because it was on appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:03 am
In it, John Kerry is giving an on-campus speech when a student begins "questioning" him about why he didn't fight harder for the presidency w [read post]
