Search for: "LEE v LEE" Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
The same newspaper reported on trial of the case of Oliver v Nine News which took place before Lee J. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is seeking an unspecified amount of damages, including aggravated damages, from Ms Rubaashini Shunmuganathan, a Malaysian who wrote an article published on sociopolitical website The Online Citizen about the 38 Oxley Road saga. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Singapore Singapore’s High Court ordered a local blogger to pay S$133,000 ($98,800) in damages to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for sharing a defamatory article about him on Facebook. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the Supreme Court to decide… [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:29 am by Wilson Ang and Charis Low
Special thanks to Charlotte Lee, Intern for her contributions to this article. [1] Public Prosecutor v Loh Cheok San [2023] SGHC 190. [2] https://www.cpib.gov.sg/press-room/press-releases/bunkering-company-and-staff-charged-cheating-and-disguising-benefits. [3] Prime Shipping Corp v Public Prosecutor [2021] 4 SLR 795, citing Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2001] 1 SLR(R) 327. [read post]