Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 5841 - 5860 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 am
According to the House of Lords decision in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416, Judge Birss had to decide: (a) whether there had been copying; (b) if yes to (a), which features had been copied; and (c) if yes to (a), whether the copying in (b) represents a substantial part of the original work. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm by admin
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:15 pm by Anthony Frost
In a one in a thousand ruling the Court would step up to recognize a new remedy for the 21st century and then lay out its reasons in a laudable display of plain language. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Fortunately for the State, the Supreme Court in 2011 decided Cavazos v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am by Lisa Stam
 This is the question in Phonedog v Noah Kavitz, a California case that will no doubt have an impact in Canada. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 2:27 am by David Vasella
Cette règle s'applique non seulement au délai envisagé à l'art. 107 al. 1 CO mais aussi, par analogie, à celui prévu par l'art. 366 al. 2 CO; en conséquence, quelle que soit l'option choisie par le maître, celui-ci peut se dispenser de la sommation et du délai lorsque l'entrepreneur s'est révélé incapable de réaliser un ouvrage conforme à ses… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm by royblack
With this introduction I pulled up the opinion of Maples v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:29 pm by royblack
” With this introduction I pulled up the opinion of Maples v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:54 pm
Today’s decision of the Court of Appeal in Apimed Medical Honey Ltd v Brightwake Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 5 is refreshingly straightforward. [read post]