Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5841 - 5860 of 21,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the following statement by the Supreme Court in the 1928 case of Frost v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
This excerpt chronicles Donald’s journey to defend Mi’kmaw treaty rights in the Supreme Court of Canada and sets the stage for understanding the impacts of R. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judgesNever Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14 and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am by msatta
Mark Satta* Last month, Aaron and Melissa Klein, a couple who owned a bakery in Oregon, asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, which held that the Kleins had violated Oregon state law by discriminating based on sexual orientation when they refused to bake a custom cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:10 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Supreme Court case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:39 am by James Billings-Kang
Employees, 567 U.S. 298, 307 (2012) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Camesi v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, Peter Wallison weighs in on Kisor v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 8:57 am by Lindsay See
Lindsay See is the solicitor general of West Virginia, which led a group of 27 other states and the governor of Kentucky in a cert-stage amicus brief in support of the petitioners in The American Legion v. [read post]