Search for: "Martin v. Martin" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2009, 10:47 pm
Though this case, Phillips v Eyre, was mainly concerned with constitutional issues, Willes J laid down a rule for choice of law in tort which endured for nearly a century before it was finally superseded. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:41 pm
Tipperary Developments Pty Ltd v The State of Western Australia [2009] WASCA 126 (22 July 2009) Related posts:Inconsistent State Laws in Australia Australian commentators have long speculated about whether the federal...Broad Grounds for Service of Australian Originating Process Outside of Australia in Tort Cases Heilbrunn v Lightwood PLC [2007] FCA 433 is a...Article on the Dichotomy of Substance and Procedure Martin Illmer has written an article titled:… [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:17 am
The California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) issued this unpublished opinion yesterday, reversing a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to introduce sufficient evidence of the defendants' financial condition. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Methuen, MA; Albert Martin, President) Alex Truck, Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
It was hard to ignore: When prime minister Paul Martin promised a major crackdown on gangs and guns in 2005, he didn't just come to their neighbourhood – he came to their building.One evening at the Centre, a counsellor asked the boys to introduce themselves and describe their ambitions. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 3:58 am
   After my post yesterday on Lorain County Judge James  Burge’s decision to grant a judgment of acquittal under CrimR 29(C) to two defendants convicted of child rape 15 years earlier, I got a call from John Martin, noted appellate practitioner and head of the county’s Public Defender appellate division, who suggested I take a gander at State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:18 am
A very interesting article in the New Law Journal (NLJ) from Laura West, barrister, Arden Chambers and Marianne Rivett, solicitor, Kennedys (currently available here) highlights some of the injustices and inconsistencies in the current tenancy deposit protection scheme (TDPS) legislation.The article considers a case heard in May 2009 in the Central London County Court, Jacklin v Fraser Property Management Ltd, T/a Martin and Co (Bedford). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
   Martin (pictured at left giving the oral argument in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:01 am
Maule describes in Part V. [read post]