Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 10,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 8:31 am
” Roberts joked that he wouldn’t ask for a show of hands of who had read their retirement-plan disclosures. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
… [H]aven’t our cases rejected that … proposition? [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
Secretary, decided Friday in an opinion by Judge Robert Luck, joined by Judges Elizabeth Branch and Ed Carnes (see the bottom of the post for my thoughts on the subject): Heather Kokesch Del Castillo, an unlicensed dietician and nutritionist, claims that Florida's Dietetics and Nutrition Practice Act, which requires a license to practice as a dietician or nutritionist, violates her First Amendment free speech rights to communicate her opinions and advice on diet and nutrition to her… [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
An interesting video where Chief Justice John Roberts discusses Lozman was posted here. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:24 am
And the conclusion of Chief Justice Roberts’ majority opinion in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
Good ethical lawyers know they shouldn’t plead a matter for which they have no legal or factual basis, and so they didn’t, and therein lies the waiver. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
So why aren’t they the prevailing party? [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Just as ‘[t]he ‘ultimate decision’ whether to invoke [a] magistrate [judge]’s assistance is made by the district court,’ Peretz, 501 U. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
Just as ‘[t]he ‘ultimate decision’ whether to invoke [a] magistrate [judge]’s assistance is made by the district court,’ Peretz, 501 U. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 12:45 pm
Because outpatient dialysis is critical to the survival of patients with end-stage renal disease, a system that makes the treatment available at a cost that patients can afford is a matter of life and death to those patients. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:59 am
Roberts pressed for more guidance on how to distinguish a covered from a non-covered class of worker, because he was “trying to figure out … exactly what you’re sweeping under the rug” – quickly adding that he didn’t mean that “in a pejorative sense. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:28 am
For that matter, Dred Scott didn't much damage the Court in the long-run; nor did Lochner and associated cases, the New Deal confrontation with Roosevelt, Truman's battle with the Court over his seizure of the steel industry, Brown, the Court's 1957 opinions favoring Communist litigants, the redistricting cases of the 1960s, Roe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
King knows: It wouldn't be fair at all. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 7:25 am
” Perhaps Roberts already was familiar with the issues in this case when he came to the bench in New Prime last month! [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm
Large law firms routinely represent criminal defendants in pro bono matters, and their clients don’t seem to protest (at least as far as we know). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:29 am
Moxley of Robert T. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 pm
Although the Roberts Court has been consistently supportive of free speech, even when the substance of that speech is unpopular or even downright offensive, it wasn’t clear this morning that Anthony Elonis can count on the same kind of support. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Roberts Jr. and by Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 10:32 am
Because Walters already has procured a federal-court order confirming the award, Badgerow seeks a ruling that federal courts are powerless to issue those orders, so she can pursue the matter in state court. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:27 pm
Didn’t work! [read post]
