Search for: "People v Goode"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 20,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 9:35 am
But that may change.The case is Christiansan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
As to the involved goods and services, the Board found helpful its decision in The Conde Nast Publications Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am
It is not uncommon for trade mark attorneys to berate marketing people about their choice of names for trade marks. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:47 am
” Before this case, a good example of the awarding of damages in an undefended infringement case can be found in 2012's Adobe v Thompson(here). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:21 am
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:06 am
Some people might consider that phrase an oxymoron; I don’t. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:23 am
Teague v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
This case is a good example. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Co v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Moran v Manchester is thus disposed of. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
The question is purely theoretical, because the list of goods and services is -- as would be expected -- not limited to the applicant's own goods sold at retail. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
Demetriades v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
In Lambert v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
The recent City of Ontario v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Any rights in one’s name do not overcome a conflict with prior rights of another: “use of one's surname is not a ‘defense’ to a trademark infringement action” Sardi's Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 3:06 am
Cir. 2003).With respect to the goods, the Board again agreed with the Examining Attorney that because there are no restrictions in the identification of goods in either the application or the cited registration, it is impermissible to “import restrictions into the identification[s] based on alleged real world conditions,” New Era Cap Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
