Search for: "People v J." Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm by Patricia Hughes
In the appeal from the tribunal’s first decision, Poelman J. also indicated Dr. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 3:36 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/513(j) It’s usually not the split of the expenses that brings people to court but the level of expenses. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 8:57 am
V(1)(J)(4) & (6) specifies "majority" as a default, but speaks only to votes of the entire Board. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2021 on Chinese countersanctions on EU entities and MEPs and MPs (2021/2644(RSP))The European Parliament,–  having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China and EU-China relations, in particular those of 21 January 2021 on the crackdown on the democratic opposition in Hong Kong(1) and of 17 December 2020 on forced labour and the situation of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region(2)… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
A Fleeting Opportunity to Terminate Publishing Contracts They say that with every  contract, the truth is in the details. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]