Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 5841 - 5860 of 19,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 7:49 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
One of the issues on appeal before the SJC in this case was the reliance by the defendants of a United States Supreme Court Case, Florida v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 3:26 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Daly (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)United States, Osage Minerals Council v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
Paper money is an entirely visual affair in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am by CMS
Manufacturers will eagerly await this decision to obtain further clarity on the entitled expectation test and how it is to be applied in the United Kingdom. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have barred such inventions from being patented. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:07 pm by Lindsey Williams
” The public is welcome to attend the hearing at 10:00 am at the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Room 201, 717 Madison Place, N.W., Washington, D.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Black Hills, the oldest mountain range in the United States, stretches across South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:26 am
 The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its CTM IMPULSE (which seem to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray) the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy. [read post]