Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 21,152
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
According to Treasury: Rosoboroneksport is a state-owned Russian weapons trading company with longstanding and ongoing ties to the Government of Syria, with billions of dollars’ worth of weapons sales over more than a decade. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
Wayfair, in which the justices will reconsider a ruling that limits the ability of state governments to require out-of-state online retailers to collect tax on sales to state residents, “the current uneasy status quo should be retained judicially as the lesser of two evils,” because “keeping the status quo is, now that the pressures on the old system are building up, more likely to lead to some form of Congressional action that could mend the… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In Barbuto v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In Barbuto v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 12:27 pm
Lagos v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:26 am
If the federal government gives the go-ahead for collecting sales tax on remote sales (a Supreme Court case, Wayfair v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:38 pm
., the State and Local Legal Center will host a webinar titled, “Internet Sales Tax: From 1967 to Oral Argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 11:20 am
On April 2, 2018, in Encino Motorcars, LLC, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Jammal v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:46 am
Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 6:38 am
Use tax isn’t new: Every state that imposes a state sales tax also imposes a state use tax. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:49 am
Not all states require consumers to pay taxes on Internet sales. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am
Dismissal of Dissolution Cause of Action for Failure to State a Valid Claim. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Insureds still have the right in the Fifth Circuit to bring suit on extra-contractual claims under state law against a flood insurer, according to the 1993 opinion, Spence v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:52 pm
State. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
Michigan Department of State Police). [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
