Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 5841 - 5860 of 10,140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
” Yet standing doctrine recognizes that sometimes constitutional issues will escape judicial review, at least in the short term – see United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 3:51 pm by Jarod Bona
Antitrust doctrine in the United States and throughout the world is constantly adjusting to both economic and academic developments. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Mike Masnick also does a great of job critiquing the decision at TechDirt, and points out that the decision has the distinction of uniting both the MPAA and Google, which is no small feat. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
The parties also worked together to improve Liberation Music's methodology for compliance with the requirements of the DMCA in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am by Devlin Hartline
How the volitional conduct test operates in the cloud is demonstrated in the Hotfile case, where the district court stated: Thus, the law is clear that Hotfile and [the owner] are not liable for direct copyright infringement because they own and manage internet facilities that allow others to upload and download copyrighted material. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:15 am
This would build on the reasoning of the Supreme Court’s decision striking down part of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
United States] we see no ground for reaching a different conclusion here. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:23 am by SHG
United States, a split decision by Justice Elena Kagan: Hell, yes! [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by Mailee Smith
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
 It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by John Bursch
The United States did not fare well before the nation’s highest Court in its most recent case involving religious liberty. [read post]