Search for: "State v. Character" Results 5841 - 5860 of 7,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc., North Atlantic Trading Company, Inc. and National Tobacco Company, LP v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cheech and ChongIn a recent detailed Order issued in the case of Detrick v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 9:18 am by Alexandre Miura
The EIPTN Committee will then select abstracts based on their innovative character and potential contribution to the teaching of IP. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:38 am by Rose Hughes
The Certificate stated that the SPC would have a term of just under 3 years, expiring in January 2022, subject to the payment of the appropriate fees. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm by Eric Alexander
            The decision in U.S. ex rel Paulos v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:30 am by ernst
Throughout, the law, while also in a state of continual change, has played at least a supporting role.Fulsome encomia by the likes of Banner and Hartog after the jump. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
Crucially, however, he held that the mark had in fact acquired a distinctive character and was therefore validly registered. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:29 am by Ben
 SCOTUS has let stand the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that said the Batmobile's bat-like appearance and high-tech gadgets make it a character that can't be duplicated without permission from DC Comics, the copyright holder.There's an interesting article from Tucker Arensberg on the JDSupra website that looks at the recent case, Dryer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:29 am by David DePaolo
An Appeals Panel agreed and Seabright sought judicial review; a Starr County District Court Judge granted summary judgment in favor of Maximina, and the 4th DCA upheld that decision last year.Seabright then asked the Texas Supreme Court to review - all the while, I presume, holding on to the death benefit money.Seabrights novel argument is that since the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Leordeanu v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:12 am by Eleonora Rosati
The Board of Appeal of the EUIPO confirmed the rejection of the sound and stated in its reasoning that the sign was not 'catchy' enough to stand out from the already existing jingles and did not fulfil the origin function of a trade mark. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Accordingly, if the words in question had no independent distinctive role, their acronym presumably couldn't have one either.Secondly, wondered the Court, how did Strigl and Securvita apply here, this being a case involving the absolute grounds for refusal of lack of distinctiveness and descriptive character of a mark, not the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
 The fact that a word is complimentary or laudatory term does not necessarily mean it is devoid of distinctive character as long as it is capable of indicating commercial origin. [read post]