Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 5841 - 5860 of 18,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
” In assessing the adequacy of these redaction, the Court of Appeal considered this point from the judgment of Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] UKSC 4): “In making the proportionality assessment under article 8, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
 Dissolution of marriage -- Jurisdiction -- Default -- Out of state service of process on husband was valid to confer jurisdiction on court although return did not list time of day that service was effected -- Amended statute removes requirement that out of state return of service forms include the time, manner, and place of service -- Trial court did not err in entering default judgment dissolving marriage, but it was error to determine child custody by default… [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlMassachusetts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:40 pm by Native American Rights Fund
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice)In re Rhoades (Prisoners - Religious Freedom; Tobacco)U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:37 am
Specifically, he claims that the habeas court improperly determined that (1) he was not prejudiced by his trial counsel's allegedly deficient performance in representing him at a pretrial hearing on the state's motion in limine seeking permission to videotape the testimony of the child victim  in his absence pursuant to State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 7:38 am by Richard
I realize that Georgia, like many states, faces a severe budget shortfall. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:16 pm
View the PDF hereDenial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from convictions on charges associated with the alleged sexual abuse of petitioner's then-six-year-old step daughter is affirmed as a state court's decisions regarding the admissibility of the child victim's hearsay statements did not involve an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and were not based on an unreasonable determination of the facts. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Unknown
United States (Monetary Damages; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am by David Markus
Cir. 2015) (member of unanimous majority) (affirming child pornography sentence); United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 2:13 pm
Mike Graczyk of Associated Press offers a preview of Smith v. [read post]