Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 26,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 1:34 pm
The Sixth Circuit criticized prosecutor conduct in two published opinions this week, yet in each case, defendants didn't receive the remedy they wanted.United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm
The case of Perry v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court ruled in the Padilla v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:19 am
”) In Vance v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
The distinctive character of the mark has to exist in the entirety of the EU for it to avoid invalidation.What underpinned the matter was whether evidence has to be proved for the entirety of the EU, and not just a select sample of countries. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
The distinctive character of the mark has to exist in the entirety of the EU for it to avoid invalidation.What underpinned the matter was whether evidence has to be proved for the entirety of the EU, and not just a select sample of countries. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:36 am
Steve Vladeck analyzed the dissent in Doe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
” Judge Watson’s analysis reminds me of a colloquy in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:23 am
On April 29, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided a fairly typical state postconviction capital case in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:02 am
See American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:08 pm
In today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 12:59 pm
From the complaint in Myers v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm
By Jason Starling In what looks to be an ominous development for public-sector unions, the United States Supreme Court, on June 30, 2015, granted a petition for certiorari by the plaintiffs in Friedrichs v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 12:29 pm
This is what happened in Bird v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
