Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 9,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:23 am
However, a federal district court in Pennsylvania granted summary judgment to the employer as to certain claimants, finding they received adequate notice as required under the Act, or suffered no adverse employment action as a result of ClosetMaid’s review of their consumer credit reports (Reardon v ClosetMaid Corp, December 2, 2013, Hornak, M). [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:31 am
First up is Hegab v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:40 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Google’s motion to dismiss The Authors Guild, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:30 pm
In holding section 21166 (and not section 21151) applied, the appellate court quoted from Moss v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The first one was Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:06 am
Dec. 3, 2013).Issue"[In view of co-pending litigation in Texas and California,] [t]he [Central District of California] court [i] dismissed count 11[, that Huawei was a third party beneficiary,] for failure to state a claim." [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:57 am
On August 15, the plaintiffs appealed both decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, pursuant to Section 1291, which gives the courts of appeals jurisdiction over “final decisions” of the district courts. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
The district court dismissed the complaint under DC’s anti-SLAPP law and for failure to state a claim. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:31 am
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2-11-436 To determine whether the lesser-included offense instruction requested by appellant should have been given, we follow a two-step analysis. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
One of our first posts was on the district court’s grant of summary judgment against the two plaintiffs in LaBarre, one of severalposts that have appeared here on good results from the Plavix litigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
V. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:14 pm
” Afro-American Publ’g Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
This past Friday, District Court Judge William H. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
This is not the first time the Fifth Ciruit, or the Supreme Court, has overruled one of our district judges on an employment discrimination lawsuit. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:59 am
In the Peterson case, the First District resolved an issue related on appeal bearing similar procedural circumstances as the Zamora case. [read post]
