Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 13,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 7:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
., v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
In Knick, the Court wiped out the “state-litigation requirement” of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
In United States Forest Service v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 10:30 pm
Despite the odds, this case landed with me instead. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
In 1966 in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Easton Land & Dev., Inc., 723 F.2d 1549, 1551 (11th Cir.1984). [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
In Sidun v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:58 am
Kapoor's second shot landed in the "rough. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Bonito Partners, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 6:57 pm
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 845 (1984)(quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:20 am
> Leases for More than 20 Years Article I, § 24 of the Iowa Constitution states that no lease of agricultural lands “shall be valid for a longer period than 20 years. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:16 am
Moreover, municipalities, professional planners and land use attorneys may be faced with the issue of whether the Bill impacts municipal parking ordinances and how they are interpreted by local land use boards. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:45 pm
The Court also discussed as instructive the case of County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Ysursa v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:34 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The appeal considered whether title to land, gifted to the Council for use as a school under the School Sites Act 1841, reverted to the donor’s estate when the school ceased to operate from the gifted land. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
The most recent is T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. [read post]