Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 5841 - 5860 of 19,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
  But, he stated, the criminal offence of conspiracy is a continuing offence. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm by Bill Heinze
(quotation and alteration marks omitted). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 63 AD3d 1113, 1116 [2d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].) [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:39 am
Council Directive 89/104 ... must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark is not entitled to prohibit use by a third party in comparative advertising of a sign that is identical with that mark for goods or services which are identical with those for which the mark is registered where such use does not affect or is not liable to affect the mark's essential function of providing a guarantee of origin or any of the mark's… [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  That occurred in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]