Search for: "State v. Register" Results 5841 - 5860 of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by James Hastings
 In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:06 am by Neil Melliship
Speaking for the unanimous Court, Rothstein J. stated: “In order for the owner of a registered trade-mark to have exclusive use of the trade-mark throughout Canada, there cannot be a likelihood of confusion with another trade-mark anywhere in the country. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am by James Hastings
 In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
Procedurally, the Court explained that section 45 is a housekeeping measure intended to rid the Canadian Trademarks Register of “deadwood”. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 11:31 am by Mark Edward Davis (CA)
Procedurally, the Court explained that section 45 is a housekeeping measure intended to rid the Canadian Trademarks Register of “deadwood”. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:29 pm by Larry Munn
According to a December, 2012 decision of the Federal Court, HomeAway.com, Inc v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing an appellate court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims on summary judgment, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the employee was not required to identify — in her pleadings — the specific “law, rule or regulation” allegedly violated by the employer in order to state a plausible claim (Webb-Weber v Community Action for Human Services, Inc, May 13, 2014, Pigott, J). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 2:45 pm by Russell Knight
Registering An Illinois Divorce Judgment In Florida An order from one state has every right to be respected and enforced in another state. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:54 pm
ARTICLE II The address of the Company’s registered office in the State of Delaware is [Corporation Trust Center, 1209  Orange Street, Wilmington, New  Castle County, Delaware 19801]. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Plaintiff Heartland Consumer Products LLC of Carmel, Indiana filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, as well as related wrongdoing under the Indiana State Trademark Act, the common law of the State of Indiana and the Indiana Crime Victims Act. [read post]