Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 44,636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2007, 9:17 am
Times, a recent California study shows improvement of public schools in the state since settlement of the lawsuit Williams v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:05 am
’ State v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:20 pm
M.A. still resides in the United States with Respondent. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
The judgment is clear that what is to be judged objectively is not the defendant’s actions but his subjective state of mind. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
Trapp v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
In Iskanian v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:08 am
In addressing Consumer Watchdog’s argument that the legal standard for approving regulatory settlements (under Circa Direct) must include consideration of whether the settlement promotes the public’s interest, the court stated that “the Second Circuit’s law on the public interest prong is still in flux, and is currently not as broad as envisioned by the Circa Direct court” (citing SEC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:39 pm
In AEI Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited [1999] 1 WLR 1507, Lord Woolf MR stated: “…it is no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly to be deprived of his costs of a particular issue on which he has failed. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
Bernstein et al., v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
" Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
Here, the patent-in-suit is still going to be a valid for a few more months, and Daimler made a counteroffer well ahead of the trial, which used to be deemed more than timely in Germany.What the CJEU meant in Huawei v. [read post]
