Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 6,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
As Michael Cholbi of the University of New York has described in his article discussing felon disenfranchisement in the United States, “A Felon’s Right to Vote”, the strong conviction held by some that criminals should not enjoy the benefit of human rights is founded upon a basic intuition that “criminal acts alter the moral status of wrongdoers, permitting us to do to them what is otherwise unjust”. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
-- Harvard medical school emeritus professor Lester Grinspoon estimates that at least $200 million is needed for studies to get a drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:04 pm
The websites that have apparently assisted in the illegal viewing of sports games that were subject to the seizure under Title 18 of the United States Code included channelsurfing.nehq-streams.com, firstrow.net, ilemi.com and rojadirecta.org. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[7] By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 8:45 am
From Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
We can still have a strong federal government, but the states have their own rights. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
The case, West Virginia v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Last month, with state bills targeting transgender youth sweeping the United States, Arkansas became the first state in the country to ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
Green v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
Green v. [read post]
