Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 5841 - 5860 of 11,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 8:38 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
Who was the first Marquette University law professor to have clerked for a justice on the United States Supreme Court? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, reversed the ruling. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A divided three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, reversed the ruling. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Army Corps of Engineers (Dakota Access Pipeline; Injunctions)Stand Up for California! [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
The post raised provocative issues along the way, and it generated quite a bit of interest.One part of the post addressed how savvy plaintiffs' lawyers try to revive lawsuits that would be time-barred in every state having an actual connection to the lawsuit - the plaintiff's home state, the defendant's home state, or the state where the plaintiff was actually injured - by filing them in a state with a more generous statute of… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 10:59 am by Arianna Morseau
With support from California ChangeLawyers, California Indian Legal Services is hiring a fulltime summer fellow (current law student), post-bar (fall) fellow, or recent law school graduate, for a 2023 summer or fall fellowship. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
S. 701 (1969), to support the conclusions of the Supreme Court of California that a State must show a “compelling state interest” to justify exclusion of ex-felons from the franchise and that California has not done so here.As we have seen, however, the exclusion of felons from the vote has an affirmative sanction in § 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, a sanction which was not present in the case of the other restrictions on the… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
You remember doing a post some while back about California passing Proposition 8, banning same-sex marriages in that state? [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), a case in which the Supreme Court upheld a warrantless search of a California parolee, limiting the reach of that case to situations in which the supervisee chooses supervision in the community (and its attendant conditions) over imprisonment. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In affirming the trial court’s judgment denying the petitions, the First District Court of Appeal – in addressing what it termed “an issue of first impression in California” — followed uniform Federal law in holding the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA; 49 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:06 am by Allison Tussey
The Court also sentenced the defendant to a three-year period of supervised release and explicitly barred him from participating in any real estate, banking, or lending-related activities. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:42 pm
The 1st District Court of Appeal in San Francisco held in the June 26 decision that an attack on such a court order, after the conservatee dies, is barred by collateral estoppel rules. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
A federal statute bars federal courts from enjoining state court proceedings, but by its terms it applies only to already-filed proceedings. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm by Michael Ginsborg
App. 2005)] Nevertheless, marriage equality opponents in Indiana believe that the law might be challenged again in state court. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  At the same time that the Delaware merger objection lawsuit filings decreased, the filing of merger objection lawsuits in other states courts has increased. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities: California: Banning Man Wins $220,000 from State Political Watchdog PanelRiverside Press-Enterprise – Craig Schultz | Published: 9/7/2018 Frank Burgess was awarded more than $200,000 in legal fees after a court found the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) violated his Constitutional protections related to a fine levied against him as a member of a nonprofit hospital board. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Erin Miller
”  Chief Justice Earl Warren echoed Douglas’s concerns in a 1954 speech to the American Bar Association. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Mark Litwak
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]