Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 5841 - 5860 of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
An undoubtedly correct I-9 is one as to which the employer has not become aware of any credible facts calling into question the right of a current employee to work in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
An undoubtedly correct I-9 is one as to which the employer has not become aware of any credible facts calling into question the right of a current employee to work in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm by Eliot Kim
The petitioners are farmers and fishermen living near that power plant. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
Many green card holders in the United States eventually apply for and attain U.S. citizenship. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
The individual certainly cannot travel to the United States and travel elsewhere in the world risks detention and possible extradition to the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 May 2008, 7:32 am
Busy day in that the Sixth published four criminal cases: two direct appeals and two habeas cases.The first of the direct appeals was United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 23-436Issue: Whether 26 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am by Nabiha Syed
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The difference between four and five can be decisive.Suppose that a petitioner seeks review of a state or lower federal court judgment upholding a death sentence against him. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
” For more on that, see here (and see also this religious exemption map of the United States). [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:01 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Rejects Conspirator's Bid to Introduce Expert Psychological Evidence About 'Poor Decisions' United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:04 am by Aurora Barnes
Reno and its progeny alleging that a city council racially gerrymandered new district boundaries when the central question is whether legislators drew boundaries with a predominant racial intent – governs the assertion of legislative privilege by state and local officials, especially in light of the tension between the Supreme Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]