Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
(Though, in United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Feb. 26, 2014) (non-precedential).IssueWhether the United States District Court for the District of Delaware properly "found that the subject matter of [U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:03 pm
Merck v Merck: what you think ... so far. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases involving attorney’s fees in patent cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Other legislation to prevent intellectual property theft was also introduced including the Deter Cyber Theft Act, which aims to block products that contain intellectual property stolen from U.S. companies by foreign countries from being sold in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Mark A. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:21 am
” Finally, the Court rejected Siegel’s reliance (seconded by the United States Trustee) on its 2007 decision in Marrama v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
Number Word Mark Click to View4488667 FIT FOR YOU View4488568 PERFECT ORIGINS View4488567 THERAVITA View4488464 AMPED View4488463 ST. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:32 am
Clemon (ret.), who not incidentally was the first African-American federal district court judge in the state; Judge Robert Sack of the Second Circuit; and Professors Sonja West (Georgia), Mark Tushnet (Harvard), RonNell Andersen Jones (BYU), David Anderson (Texas), and Christopher Schmidt (Chicago-Kent). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
In McKinney v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
How the volitional conduct test operates in the cloud is demonstrated in the Hotfile case, where the district court stated: Thus, the law is clear that Hotfile and [the owner] are not liable for direct copyright infringement because they own and manage internet facilities that allow others to upload and download copyrighted material. . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
United States, 993 F.2d 211, 213 (11th Cir. 1993) (“[I]n order to recover damages under the Jones Act, [a plaintiff] must have the status of a seaman. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:27 am
United States that when individuals act in their official capacity as corporate agents, they “cannot be said to be exercising their personal rights and duties nor to be entitled to their purely personal privileges. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
