Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
  The proposal is to submit a “constitutional amendment to Texas voters that would prohibit foreclosures by associations on homesteads within their jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
  Only a sample is used to make these projections because it would take too much time and be too expensive to determine how every voter will vote. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:48 am
Gardner offers a sustained critique of a line of Supreme Court election law cases recognizing "dignitary rights" of voters, including Shaw v. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Here's what 42 U.S.C. 2000e(f) says, according to Westlaw:(f) The term “employee” means an individual employed by an employer, except that the term “employee” shall not include any person elected to public office in any State or political subdivision of any State by the qualified voters thereof, or any person chosen by such officer to be on such officer's personal staff, or an appointee on the policy making level or an immediate adviser with respect to the… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
Recall Hawaii's gay marriage case, Baehr v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:47 am
Note: on August 20, 2009, the Hawaii Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a separate but related case, Dupree v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
In answering that question, consider how GottaLaff and her commenters deal with communications from the guy who wrote the poll app — who says he is an Obama voter. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
  Also as part of "Supreme Court Week," CSPAN has a new poll investigating voter views of the Supreme Court, including the impact that the landmark ruling in Bush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:46 pm
A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals of Indiana, Indiana's intermediate appellate court, ruled yesterday in League of Women Voters v. [read post]