Search for: "v. " Results 5841 - 5860 of 493,813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
To the contrary, and unlike the situation [under the previously applicable rules],[v] the Legislator has expanded the concept of enforceable titles (al-sanadat al-tanfidhiyya),[vi] which now includes criminal judgments involving restitution (radd), compensations (ta’widhat), fines (gharamat) and other civil rights (huquq madaniyyah). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:43 pm by Tom Mayo
The latest blockbuster decision from SCOTUS is "the bump stock case," Garland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 12:20 pm by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  The New Jersey Supreme Court recently clarified the permissible scope of non-disparagement agreements in those settlement agreements in the case of Savage v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:07 am by Howard Bashman
“Opinionpalooza: SCOTUS Says Yes to Bump Stocks, No to Gun Safety Regulation; Justice Clarence Thomas overturns the bump stock ban in his deadly Garland v Cargill majority opinion. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
In this sense, decisions like those of the US Copyright Office in Zarya of the Dawn [IPKat here] and the Beijing Internet Court in Li v Liu [IPKat here] are helpful. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:32 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times “The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to limit access to a widely used abortion medication, rejecting a challenge from antiabortion doctors two years after the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:20 am by Unreported Opinions
The other victim, Cynthia Aaron, was shot in the back of […] The post ADRIAN LEWIS v. [read post]