Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 5861 - 5880 of 191,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The issues in these cases are whether the right of access to a lawyer prior to police questioning, which was established by Salduz v Turkey (2008) 49 EHRR 421, applies only to questioning which takes place when the person has been taken into police custody; and, if the rule applies at some earlier stage, from what moment does it apply. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The issues in these cases are whether the right of access to a lawyer prior to police questioning, which was established by Salduz v Turkey (2008) 49 EHRR 421, applies only to questioning which takes place when the person has been taken into police custody; and, if the rule applies at some earlier stage, from what moment does it apply. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Z (A child) [2012] EWHC 139 (Fam) is, to my knowledge, the first reported relocation case since MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793.To briefly recap, in MK v CK it was made clear that the only principle to be drawn from Payne v Payne [2001] 1 FLR 1052 - which had skewed relocation decisions for ten years - was the paramountcy principle - everything else was guidance.Returning to Z (A child) :The facts: This case comes with a lot of 'baggage', primarily related to the… [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 8:59 am by Stefan Padfield
UPDATE 2/1/12:  Go here to get some background on Stone v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
I have been notified of another post-Koken case in favor of consolidation. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:53 pm by scottgaille
The owner or sponsor (“Sponsor”) of the project must be able to implement changes after a construction agreement has been signed. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm
  Since he hasn't even been charged with that crime. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Bystander
I have borrowed this from the excellent Criminal Solicitor dot net site; it deals with an ASBO that appears to have been less than totally successful in bringing an offender to heel:-Heron v Plymouth City Council [2009] This was an appeal by way of case stated against the decision of the Magistrates' Court, who, on the City Council's application, allowed an application to vary an anti-social behaviour order that had originally been imposed on the appellant. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 5:07 am by Jamison Koehler
If it is a criminal case, it means that you have been charged with a crime. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
The decision means that debate about the merits of the English Court of Appeal decision in Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 have been put to bed once and for all. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:37 pm
Justice Cullen noted that in a previous decision, Grigg v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm by Mike
Held: Despite he authority of Reed and another; R v Garmson[2009] a DNA profile could still be reliable, even if the amount of DNA in that profile was below 200 picograms, provided the necessary reproducibility had been demonstrated. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:36 pm by Mike
Held: Despite he authority of Reed and another; R v Garmson[2009] a DNA profile could still be reliable, even if the amount of DNA in that profile was below 200 picograms, provided the necessary reproducibility had been demonstrated. [read post]