Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 21,329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
That was the issue in today's ruling in People v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
Stage 1: Entitled Expectation Lord Tyre considered the leading authorities on the issue of “defect” under the CPA, namely Wilkes v DePuy International Limited [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB) and Gee and Ors v DePuy International Limited [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
Boland was also a member of the CMA’s internal complaints handling body, the Grievance Committee. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 2:35 am
Constitutional dimensions...The court answered this question in the affirmative and considered that an administrative body such as sports professional bodies, professional associations, etc. may validly exercise public functions or public powers without any empowering statute so long as it does so within the boundaries of “empowering provisions” issued by its members. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:05 am
Robertelli v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:08 am
Suriano v. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
”[12]As a result, the status of employees of statutory bodies which are not engaged in inalienable state functions remain unclear. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
”[12]As a result, the status of employees of statutory bodies which are not engaged in inalienable state functions remain unclear. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 4:00 pm
Click to read full article [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:39 pm
EPIC: "In a FOIA lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security, EPIC has just obtained documents concerning the radiation risks... [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:54 pm
” Ugast v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:39 am
Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:04 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:38 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:35 am
There was no prior determination by an administrative body, a prerequisite for bringing an Article 78 proceeding. [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:04 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
