Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 17,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 4:00 am
The New York Times published a major story last week, drawing on research from the cybersecurity company Symantec. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
Fox defended an infringement case juxtaposing 9/11 and WWII images—court [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
First, the defendants argued that in the 1995 agreement with Eminem the Bass Brothers were defined as "Company"; speculating that there might be a real company, nowhere identified, which was the first owner of the copyright. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:00 am
Takeaway The Court’s opinion in Zola reinforces the preeminence of federal law over state law claims when used as a weapon to try to avoid the restrictions against securities companies under both the PLSRA and the SLUSA. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:30 pm
The parties to the securities class action lawsuit entered mediation. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Signs were posted above the carts stating that safety was first for the company, and that any questions about how to use the carts should be directed to one of the team members in the store. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:00 am
The defendant consented to a permanent injunction prohibiting him from future violations of Rule 10b-5 and agreed to pay a penalty of approximately $250,000. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The claim concerns tweets by the defendant calling Dr Wright a fraud, Internet and Social Media There are pieces by Daphne Keller on the CIS blog entitled “What platform operations are we regulating? [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
12 May 2019, 7:10 am
See Doing Business in China Without a WFOE: Will the Defendant Please Rise for a good example of where China has really cracked down against foreign companies and see China Employer Audits: The FAQs for a good example of the sort of thing foreign companies are doing in China to avoid future legal problems. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
Because the defendant was himself an attorney, he was qualified to offer an expert opinion on the matter. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:23 am
[VirginiaBusiness]Company pays $2 million in kickback, bribery suit involving Fort Bliss construction contract. [read post]
10 May 2019, 5:00 am
Don’t rely on an inexperienced attorney to defend you. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:00 pm
Ancillary companies, which do not handle marijuana, support the plant-touching businesses and provide products and services such as grow equipment, greenhouses, extraction equipment, consumption devices, bottling, packaging, branding, compliance, consulting, physical security, point-of-sale software, transportation, and media. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:06 am
In addition to the Rule, HHS continues to review a number of other rules and proposals it hopes to further advance the American Patients First blueprint initiative to improve drug price transparency and inform consumer decision making by fixing opaque systems, changing incentives that drive costs or other undesirable behaviors by pharmaceutical companies, prescription benefit management (“PBM”) companies, health insurers and plans, providers and patients. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:00 pm
We no longer test whether a case meets the requirements to be a class action, defend the allegations through discovery, or give the defendants the chance to defend the truth of what they said in a deposition. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
[As Matt Levine of Money Stuff says, sounds like securities fraud because everything is securities fraud.] [read post]
8 May 2019, 5:08 am
The appellate court did agree with the plaintiffs, however, that there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the defendants were aware they owed the plaintiffs a duty, whether the property owner had effectively passed her duty to the maintenance company, and whether the defendants engaged in negligent maintenance of the water feature. [read post]
8 May 2019, 5:08 am
The appellate court did agree with the plaintiffs, however, that there were genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the defendants were aware they owed the plaintiffs a duty, whether the property owner had effectively passed her duty to the maintenance company, and whether the defendants engaged in negligent maintenance of the water feature. [read post]
