Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 7,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
I have no way of knowing whether 1) is true and I am highly dubious about 2). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
This section does not prohibit a person who possesses a handgun from entering the licensed premises for a limited time for the specific purpose of either: 1. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:07 pm
Unfortunately, X will have a very serious negative impact on society. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:34 am
That does not apply in your case. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
(c) D7, alleged to represent the history of the development of visible light photo-catalysis, does not mention either any Index X. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
To get up to speed on the major provisions of Title X, I listened to a briefing entitled Dodd-Frank Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Creation of a New Federal Regulator. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
If the lawyer starts the conversation with, “I’ve only got 5 minutes before I have to do X,” that may be a warning sign that you are a time waster. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm
App'x. at 290. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
But it really works better if I can take the x-rays, develop the x-rays, put the fingers in a trap, let the weight align the greenstick fracture, and then cast the broken bone. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:52 pm
A year or so ago, I made what I thought was a mild reproach against Klein for what I regarded as a cheap shot at Greg Mankiw — agree or disagree with Mankiw, talking about his “unbearable lightness of being” does not seem any kind of accurate description; I added something akin to what I’ve said above about lack of reportorial experience or judgment. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:01 pm
I could not agree more. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:44 am
Title X creates the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
[Note: $3,150,000 = (7% x 300,000 solos) x ($150)] The real question is: how will the ABA use that $3 million? [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:58 am
” The draft TS also provides five suggested forms of nano-disclosure for use in the existing ingredient section of product labels: “a manufactured nanoscale form of X;” “0.1 g of nanoscale X;” “X, approximately size range P nm - Q nm, specific surface area R m2 g-1;” “a dispersion of manufactured nanoscale X in Y;” and/or “[nanoscale shape of] X, with an aspect ratio of 1:20. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
The factory in which they worked was a 10 x 15-foot wooden shed with the words "Harley-Davidson Motor Company" crudely scrawled on the door. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
The Incredible, while not HDMI quality, does all of these things. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:44 am
That fact has nothing to do with the negotiating dynamics of the FourSquare deal, I'm sure, but it does suggest that Andreessen Horowitz doesn't get distracted with non-essential stuff.) [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 5:45 am
Droid X's Wi-Fi hot spot: Boon and bane | Nanotech - The Circuits Blog - CNET News. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
Aside from the Federal Trade Commission – which protects consumers and competition in broadband just as in every other competitive industry – not to mention the Antitrust Division, the FCC has always had jurisdiction to regulate broadband under Title I of the Communications Act, a fact noted by the Supreme Court in 2005 in the Brand X decision (“the Commission remains free to impose special regulatory duties on facilities-based ISPs under its Title… [read post]
