Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 5861 - 5880 of 40,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2022, 5:07 am by Samantha S. Erks, JD
That chapter does require more than one act, but the specific definition of harassment does not. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:18 pm
Nor does the punishment her uncle received establish gross disproportionality. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 4:56 pm
A sixty-nine year old man who was convicted of his first non-violent crime has sentencing guidelines that recommend a judge sentence him to twenty years in prison.What kind of legal system does that to one of its citizens? [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:01 am by John Day
The case went to trial, and after plaintiff’s proof, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict on the basis that plaintiff had failed to establish (1) the standard of care for ophthalmologists in the area at the time of the procedure and (2) that defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the damages. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
This said, the judge quickly considered the two last requirements of Section 97A CDPA and concluded that (1) both users and the operators of the websites in issue used the Defendants' services to infringe the Claimants' copyrights, and (2) the Defendants had actual knowledge that users and the operators of the Websites use the Defendants' services to infringe copyright. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
"So step back.If a plaintiff files a lawsuit and argues trade secrets misappropriation, what does it need to prove? [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  However, the privilege does not protect “unnecessary or unreasonable publication to parties outside the litigation .... [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
Since defendants C and BW' cross motion does not seek relief nearly identical to the relief sought by the plaintiff, and as they have not established good cause for their late cross injury motion, the cross motion is denied as untimely. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:22 pm by Brian Wm. Higgins
Mensa’s support of scientific colloquia and some research does not make it sufficiently similar to the Defendants research. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Attorney 1 sues attorney 2 over fees, but does not sue the estate. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm by Keith Donoghue
Tydel John, No. 09-4185 (Aug. 15, 2011), the Court holds 2-1 that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply — and that evidence must therefore be suppressed — when an officer obtains and executes a warrant for child pornography by means of an affidavit representing that people who commit contact sex offenses against children customarily keep evidence of such crimes, including “photographs,” in their homes. [read post]