Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 7,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
The English Court encountered this situation recently in R v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
See Rosalind English’s post. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
In proceedings by prisoners subsequently heard in Scotland (Smith v Scott [2007] SC 345), Northern Ireland (R v Secretary of State ex parte Toner and Walsh [1997] NIQB 18) and in England and Wales (Chester v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 1439) the relevant Secretary of State has expressly accepted that the ban on prisoner voting is incompatible with the ECHR. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm
This doctrine, which provides that the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments contain substantive limits on the power of federal and state governments, has been an important protector of rights since its beginnings in English law. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
There is one decision in the files of Plain English Legal Publications addressing this question, at least peripherally -- Division of Military and Naval Affairs v PERB, 103 AD2d 876. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
In the first case, Pharmethod v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am
I quickly found a case stating the relevant rule of law—every contract needs consideration, or something. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:59 am
I quickly found a case stating the relevant rule of law--every contract needs consideration, or something. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:48 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
See today’s In the courts Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011): Coalition cancellation of school-building program was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
" In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
But as an idea it is surely valid, as it works on precisely the federalist, greater than the sum of its parts logic which informs many of the successful modern states and institutions, including the USA, the UN and the EU. [read post]
