Search for: "Gaines v. State" Results 5861 - 5880 of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
By Mike Dorf Last year, in Ricci v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:51 am
I was intrigued by the recent SC decision in Principal, Kendriya Vidyalaya and Ors. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
The UK Secretary of State for Justice, Kenneth Clarke recently released his government’s Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog)   US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Deduction for State and local general sales taxes (sec. 164(b)(5))31. 15-year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements, qualified restaurant buildings and improvements, and qualified retail improvements (secs. 168(e)(3)(E)(iv), (v), (ix), 168(e)(7)(A)(i), (8))32. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, for any legislation to pass, it must not only procure sufficient support in two quite different legislative branches, but gain as well presidential signature. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am by Merpel McKitten
  The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
Justice Ginsburg added that a 2009 decision, District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
But then at some point, as you and others are fooled by human v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
Kishore Mahbubani, Singapore’s former ambassador to the United Nations, argues that the city-state is at an “inflection point” . [read post]
”  While recognizing the enormous gains to be realized through the application of new technologies which generate and gather enormous amounts of data, the report warns that data and privacy protections stemming from the Fourth Amendment and famously enunciated by the dissent of Justice Brandeis in the 1928 Supreme Court case, Olmstead v. [read post]