Search for: "Harvard Law Review" Results 5861 - 5880 of 8,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
, 58 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 69 (2023) The events of January 6th 2021, and the era of emboldened armed white supremacist violence that surrounded the United States Capitol attack spurred state commitment to counter “white supremacist terrorism. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Early on in law school, law students begin to realize that legal norms are not all cut from the same cloth. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:22 pm by James Hamilton
See testimony of Hal Scott, Director of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation and Professor and Director of the Program on International Financial Systems at Harvard Law School, before the House Agriculture Committee (April 13, 2011). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:09 am
(See Elhauge, E., 2016, Horizontal Shareholding, Harvard Law Review 129 discussed on the Forum here, and Azar, J., M. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Cass R. Sunstein
Professor Sunstein’s lecture drew on an article that he subsequently published in the Harvard Law Review. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:03 am by Neil Richards
His many scholarly and popular writings on privacy and civil liberties have appeared in media from the Harvard Law Review and The Yale Law Journal to The Guardian, WIRED and Slate. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
There are some important efforts to rethink wartime, including Harvard Law Professor Mark Tushnet’s argument that we should think of contemporary war as an ongoing condition, not a confined wartime, and some of the work on the idea of a “long war. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 1:30 pm by Melanie Fontes
  * Michael Svedman is a 2L at Harvard Law School and the Executive Article Editor of the Harvard Law & Policy Review. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:02 am
Richardson, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, onMonday, September 5, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, In re Trulia, Materiality, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder suits, State law, U.S. federal courts The Effect of Prohibiting Deal Protection in M&A: Evidence from the United Kingdom Posted by Fernán Restrepo, Stanford Law School and Guhan Subramanian, Harvard… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The formal criteria for certiorari review adumbrated in Supreme Court Rule 10 underscore interjurisdictional conflict and “important question[s] of federal law,” including disputes about statutory interpretation and administrative law. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:26 pm
Thank you, Professor.UPDATE II: Here is the blurb on the discussion of this "top 5 list" posted on The Harvard Corporate Governance Law Blog today, courtesy of Robert Jackson, Managing Editor of that blog.UPDATE III: Here is a link  that Professor Bainbridge was kind enough to post on his blog to the "thrust and parry". [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction Early on in law school, law students begin to realize that legal norms are not all cut from the same cloth. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:40 am
Introduction Early on in law school, law students begin to realize that legal norms are not all cut from the same cloth. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bridges             The November issue of the Harvard Law Review is always dedicated to the Supreme Court’s most recently concluded Term. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:21 am by Jeff Gamso
 He played professionally for a year after college, then went to Harvard for law school. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I explained at length in a Harvard Law Review essay reviewing Living Originalism, I disagree with Balkin on some important points, but not on the central one: new originalism leaves modern readers of the Constitution with nearly the same amount of room to maneuver as do more conventional versions of living constitutionalism. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court does not have the power to rule on the case the Justices have agreed to review on the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, a Harvard law professor argued in a brief filed Thursday evening. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Arianna Morseau
Harvard Law School Senior Staff Attorney. [read post]