Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 5861 - 5880 of 182,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 3:01 pm by Glenn Reynolds
I don’t actually expect any answers based on the time line but they would be interesting. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:32 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
Divorce Saloon offers an interesting top 10 of how a gentleman should act during divorce: 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
Mike Dorf has an interesting post about why right-wing "Dworkinianism" has never developed on the right. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
There are quite a few other examples of ways that the current domain name registration system can be stretched to do things it wasn't intended to - sometimes illegally. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
But under Ruvolo's theory, isn't this at least theft? [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
.): Presently before the court is Plaintiff Jane Roe's Motion to Proceed under a Fictitious Name … and her Motion to Seal the Certificate of Interested Parties …. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:58 pm by Caryn Tamber
There's an interesting case out of Florida (where else?) [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
McClain, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 'Legislating Morality': On Conscience, Prejudice, and Whether 'Stateways' Can Change 'Folkways', (95 Boston University Law Review 891 (2015)).Ahmad T. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Evelyn Douek
But isn’t the decision to suspend Trump’s account a take-down decision? [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It was in the appellant’s interest to submit all new facts, arguments and evidence as soon as possible, and certainly before the OPs, so as to avoid the possible risk of taking aback the [patent proprietors] and/or the board, and thereby compelling the board to adjourn the OPs or to disregard these new facts, arguments and/or evidence. [28.5] Indeed, the appellant’s failure to submit the new argument in reply to the board’s communication deprived… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 10:55 pm
The order isn't reported yet, but I thought I'd post on Judge Clark's recent opinion (June 9, 2008) denying the defendant's motion for leave to amend its invalidity contentions in the Iovate v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 1:07 pm
Here's the bottom line -- no one trusts those machines anymore. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Kenan Farrell
Here’s a fairly interesting trade dress lawsuit involving a food product I didn’t even know existed…egg white wraps. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
She has also worked at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
She has also worked at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 5:57 am by Florian Mueller
But with respect to "fair use" (which Android's use ofthe Java APIs isn't according to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), Microsoft actually sided with the weak-IP camp.I don't understand why. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:27 pm by Mark Tushnet
The talk was followed by a performance of excerpts from some of Handel's operas (which I found less interesting). [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:18 am by Jeff Foust
A couple other items of interest: As you might expect from previous statements, Sen. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:49 am by Rick Hasen
 Any interested candidate will need to get 2,000 certified signatures by that date (which means well above 2,000 total if you figure in the names that will be thrown out), or they won’t be on the ballot. [read post]