Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 5861 - 5880 of 12,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 4:30 am by Adam Wagner
However, in a call to restrict the fees of libel lawyers, this may end up limiting the access to justice of those who feel they have been defamed. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:42 pm
I’ve posted a more extensive discussion of the Medellin opinions and their implications over at the Opinio Juris blog here. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
This new filing sets the stage for the Justices to take their first look soon at the case of In re Electronic Privacy Information Center (docket 13-58), a rather unusual legal protest that is being pursued directly in the Court, with no prior lower court decision on the challenge. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 9:22 pm
The justices said Borgen tried to play on the passions of the jury and misstated the evidence. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Conor McEvily
  Gerard Magliocca discusses the extension (and its possible implications) at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
3 May 2008, 7:15 am
  Is the case going to be re-argued before the new panel? [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:10 pm
So even if you try to tell me you're not interesting, I bet you are, and I'd love to have you do a profile. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 9:34 am
In yesterday’s In re Valerie W., case no. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:59 pm
It is the justices' majority opinion that it is unconstitutional to impose a punishment that was not in effect at the time of the crime. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:47 pm by Neil Schoenherr
In several of his lower court opinions, his methodology has led him to vote in favor of overturning criminal convictions or other defendant-friendly outcomes,” Epps said. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am by Jeffrey Carr
They’re pretty standard fare on mid-afternoon and late-night television. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:09 am by Bonnie Shucha
Gorsuch’s majority opinion, as I said before, is really quite straightforward. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:02 am by Marcia Coyle
But the Trump Administration and conservative lawyers and judges re-energized it as they saw in the doctrine a potent tool to cut back the growth of regulations by federal agencies, or what is called “the administrative state. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:42 am by Orin Kerr
Justice Antonin Scalia piled on by asking Gura why he’d take this more difficult path “unless you’re bucking for some place on a law school faculty. [read post]