Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 8,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
In a decision issued this morning in Williamson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Yesterday the SCOTUS handed down the long-awaited decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:50 pm
Precon Development Corporation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:36 pm
Analysis Near the end of the Supreme Court’s argument Tuesday in Bond v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
S., at 297 (opinion of Kennedy , J.). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
In Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:43 pm
By contrast, in 2006, the Court in Randall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
(And please, don't just listen to the State Bar of Texas that proposed them and thinks they're the bee's knees because, frankly it's hard to see just why even when they try to explain it.)If you're unsure, read what Texas lawyers Mark Bennett and Paul Kennedy have to say. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
" Pucci v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
On January 19, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Harrington v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
In the relevant portion of Teague (parts IV and V, in which only four justices—O’Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Kennedy—joined), Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
