Search for: "Little v State" Results 5861 - 5880 of 23,804
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Trafficking laws do not apply to schedule III, IV or V drugs. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be stated in the absence of an attorney-client relationship ( Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v Scott & Schechtman, 286 A.D.2d 732 [2d Dept. 2001]). [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
The new appeal, in a legal form that the Court has little choice but to decide it, is an attempt to expand the impact of the Justices’ ruling in January, in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 12:13 pm by Erin Miller
Below, Tiffany Cartwright, a student at Stanford Law School, analyzes the opinion in Wood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Joshua Auriemma
Love for Our Geeks - @andyfromcornell writes in to pimp the Penn State Law Civil Rights Clinic’s recent grant of cert in Coleman v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:05 am by Carlene Nicol
  Employees are entitled to the full suite of employment rights, while self-employed contractors have very little protection under employment law. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 3:54 pm by Jon Ibanez
The California Court of Appeals in the case of People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
A little over a year ago we caught considerable flak for our posts about Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:11 am by SHG
Reading the Second Circuit’s affirmance of District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s suppression ruling in United States v. [read post]