Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5861 - 5880 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
After procedural history not relevant here, in September 2016, the Town and Village jointly moved to dismiss each proceeding "for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to [DCH]'s failure to satisfy a condition precedent for challenging the assessments"—namely "[t]he failure of the [o]wner to submit [the] RP-524 [c]omplaints. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm by Public Employment Law Press
After procedural history not relevant here, in September 2016, the Town and Village jointly moved to dismiss each proceeding "for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to [DCH]'s failure to satisfy a condition precedent for challenging the assessments"—namely "[t]he failure of the [o]wner to submit [the] RP-524 [c]omplaints. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
That statute provides, in pertinent part, that "[a] person is guilty of a class B felony if ... [read post]
12 May 2023, 7:49 am by Cyberleagle
I cannot see off-platform (or for that matter off-internet) information. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:58 pm
= -1) && (sUserLength > 0) && (mstatus1 == 'true')) { var popupurl1='http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/insertclipping/msid-'+msid+',random-'+ inRandom +'.cms'; document.getElementById('b').style.display="inline"; document.getElementById('t').style.display="none"; populatedivtab(popupurl1,'b'); } … [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
‘Penalty notices for certain civil offences’ is downright odd, as a) these are civil offences and b) councils aren’t the claimant in civil matters. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
‘Penalty notices for certain civil offences’ is downright odd, as a) these are civil offences and b) councils aren’t the claimant in civil matters. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:04 am by Russ Bensing
  The State was supposed to elect whether to have Driggins sentenced on either the (A) or (B) section of the murder statute, but didn’t. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:49 am by David Lat
But covering every move by partners from Firm A to Firm B as a triumph for Firm B, the receiving firm, isn’t always accurate. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 2417 (1997).)(5) The law can’t be justified under “strict scrutiny” as being narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest in “aid[ing] parental authority” by “ensure[ing] that parents can decide what games are appropriate,” because(a) the industry’s voluntary self-regulation already “does much to ensure that minors cannot purchase seriously violent games on their own, and that parents who care about the matter can… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 10:11 am by John-Paul Boyd
” Moreover, the taxpayer wouldn’t find s. 56.1 from reading s. 56 concerning non-employment sources of income to be included in the taxpayer’s taxable income, as s. 56.1 isn’t even mentioned in s. 56. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:21 am
  If  [Competitor A] or you decide not to go through with the price change to match [Competitor B] pricing, then it won’t work, we need all 3 of us to do this. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:12 pm
Federal courts are often focused on more pressing matters, which can mean delays, she noted. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm by CharlesB
Under title II, if there is any person who qualifies as a substitute party under 20 CFR 404.503(b) and wishes to pursue the request for hearing, the ALJ will not dismiss the request for hearing because a substitute party is a person who may be adversely affected by a dismissal. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
This Jan. 16, 2008 ILB entry quotes from an Indianapolis Star story that mentions, at the end of a long story about another individual:Buntin said he hasn't decided whether to file a federal lawsuit seeking compensation for a wrongful conviction. [read post]