Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 5,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2006, 6:35 am
Good pictures at www.deppenapostroph.de A video of an elephant seeing itself in a mirror is linked in this New Scientist article (via rebecca's pocket). [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 4:20 am
Montex objected, claiming that the mere transit of goods through Germany did not infringe Diesel's trade mark rights. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
The Office stresses that when patients are confronted by a mark, they are not to be misled as to the origin of the goods designated. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
C. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 6:57 am
Deontology: An action is right if and only if the action is either (a) required by a moral duty, or (b) allowed by a moral permission, and not (c) forbidden by a moral prohibition. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 5:15 am
Do we really need a dozen more Seawolf submarines or should we have 50 more C-17s and C-5s? [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 1:30 am
On Tuesday, 7 November there's a hearing before the Grand Chamber in Case C-17/06 Céline, this being a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Nancy on the following question: "Must Article 5(1) of Directive 89/104 [the Trade Mark Harmonisation Directive] be interpreted as meaning that the adoption, by a third party without authorisation, of a registered word mark, as a company name, business name or style in… [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 5:46 pm
One of them was marketed by Allergan under the BOTOX trade mark and they were both used to treat various muscle conditions.Issues arose concerning the validity of the patent in respect of two of its claims. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 9:19 pm
Skelly's first post on A&C was July 4, 2004: Mission Statement. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 9:17 pm
These videos appear to be the work of Dave Haendler, a recent U of C graduate. [read post]
8 Oct 2006, 3:42 am
The defense is not that good that it can counterbalance poor offensive playcalling all the time. [read post]
1 Oct 2006, 8:34 am
The likely political consequences have been carefully tested in a serious of studies by Mark Landau and his colleagues. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 8:17 pm
This means that a famous mark will be protected, and dilution will be found, even if a similar mark is used to identify the source of completely unrelated goods or services. [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 12:56 am
Dyson: the Advocate General speaksAdvocate General Leger gave his Opinion yesterday in European Court of Justice Case C‑321/03, Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks, a reference for a preliminary ruling on a point of trade mark law from the High Court for England and Wales.Since 1993 Dyson has made and sold its Dual Cyclone vacuum cleaner, a bagless cleaner in which the dirt and dust is collected in a transparent plastic container forming part of the… [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 4:36 am
For those too lazy to peruse Duncan's own site or to access the decision for themselves, the court concluded that, to establish that a colour has in fact become distinctive of goods or services, it is necessary to use that colour alone, as the trade mark. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 8:08 am
The challenger, Don Cohn, sounds good too, but I'm for retention during good behavior. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 7:25 am
Laboratoires Riva Inc. 2006 FC 889, the Federal Court held that the trade-mark DAMYLIN was not confusing with the mark CALMYLIN, even though both are used on cough syrup. [read post]
18 Jul 2006, 11:51 pm
Jones, Mark. [read post]
6 May 2006, 5:32 pm
The classification of the mark becomes very important in this context because only "famous" marks qualify for protection from dilution under Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 12:59 am
Shock generic use of electrical goods trade markToday the European Court of Justice is hearing arguments in Case C-321/03 Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks. [read post]
