Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 5861 - 5880 of 12,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm by David Ryan
OSS asks the various government stakeholders who might have equities in those documents to determine their level of classification. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Eric S. Solotoff
The Appellate Division decided this question in the negative in the reported (precedential) case of Landers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm by Steven M. Taber
  This relation remained after controlling for individual data, zip code level socioeconomic status and demographics, air pollution, and roadway proximity variables. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: Views v. downloads: people download stuff they don’t watch. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How will second-level domain name disputes? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
One comment uttered that “people like this should go and shit a hedgehog and spend all their money on their mothers’ tombs until they drop dead”. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:44 am by Robichaud
Perhaps its shocking to some, but those people motivated to exaggerate, omit, or deceive do not exclude their own counsel from such proclivities. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:47 am by Sarah M Donnelly
 He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:27 am by Sean Wajert
 Certainly there were known exposure levels which cause people to report symptoms such as nausea and headache. [read post]