Search for: "STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 9,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
Tuesday, Nov. 27 New Jersey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court's 1996 Romer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:46 am
Div. 2001) (citing State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Div. 2004), aff’d as modified, 183 N.J. 290 (2005), in discussing the possibility of double-dipping arising from the manner in which the husband’s salary and the value of his closely-held business were calculated, the court limited the doubledipping prohibition to pensions, and the court further stated in the pension context: In New Jersey, the bar against double counting of pensions is restricted to income from pension benefits that have been treated… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
The State of New York Unified Court System [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
To download a copy of the New York County Supreme Court's decision, please use this link: Greenbaum v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In those decades, she says, “advances in scientific study have strongly suggested that eyewitnesses are apt to erroneously identify a person…when certain factors are present, ” and she cites the 2011 opinion of the New Jersey Supreme Court in New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In those decades, she says, “advances in scientific study have strongly suggested that eyewitnesses are apt to erroneously identify a person…when certain factors are present, ” and she cites the 2011 opinion of the New Jersey Supreme Court in New Jersey v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:36 am
In fact, they said New Jersey law should control all of the potentially hundreds of thousands of class members’ claims and recoveries throughout the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:26 am
However, the question of duration had not been addressed by the courts or legislature of New Jersey, and so the California federal court was asked to rule on what New Jersey's highest court would likely determine to be the postmortem duration of that state's common law right of publicity. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:10 am
State Bank, 87 N.J. 163, 176 (1981), citing Gellert v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
From Yeshiva Univ. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:35 am
Now, the federal district court in New Jersey has similarly rejected class certification in two consolidated suits in which state residents argued that DuPont should pay for a medical monitoring program because their drinking water was allegedly contaminated with a Teflon-related chemical. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
The decision in New Jersey v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 10:10 am
To address this situation, New Jersey courts, starting with the case of Kozlowski v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
The FLSA class is made up of all sales employees who worked in any state or U.S. territory from March 2009 until the present while the New York State class includes all sales representatives employed at Novo in New York for at least one day from March 2006 to the present who do not opt out. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
The Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division in E.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
