Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 32,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Under Ninth Circuit precedent, “a suit, the primary benefit of which would inure to the state,” could not satisfy the requirements of federal diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
San Francisco-based attorney Thomas Frankovich is well known for making his living bringing hundreds of disability-access suits for serial plaintiffs across the state. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Here is what they have to say below: Sisvel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Sehl v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:50 pm
The cases are entitled Li et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 7:50 pm
In the case of Montrief v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:45 am
In Neev v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 10:21 pm
Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:51 am
§1983 turns on whether the applicable state statute is inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States; Robinson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 8:00 am
Eid v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:34 pm
By Deborah Juneau The Louisiana Supreme Court issued its new opinion after a rehearing in Borel v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:10 am
Maria Goretti Congregation v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
Facts: This case (LIPTON et al v. [read post]
