Search for: "State v House"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 28,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 11:30 am
President Obama delivered a statement (full text) in the White House briefing room praising Souter's service on the court. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 pm
In House Bill 27, passed last September, dependents were also barred from receiving death benefits while incarcerated. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
The Cash v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm
Because while everything else in the Constitution can be amended by a 2/3 vote in each house of Congress followed by ratification by 3/4 of the States, the Constitution provides a special rule for equal representation in the Senate: "no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:04 am
In Epic Systems v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:49 am
The Third Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:25 pm
President Biden spoke with President Vladimir V. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:02 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court, in Granholm v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
In 2017 WF accepted the full housing duty. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
(In United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
MP, R(on the application of) v the Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 214 (Admin) – read judgment The prison authorities had acted unlawfully in restricting childcare resettlement leave to prisoners who were within two years of their release date and had been allocated to “open” conditions. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The consolidated cases are Gill v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
One month after sending the Fourteenth Amendment to the states, the House of Representatives firmly rejected any constitutional distinction between the phrases “office under” and an “office of” as they were used in various constitutional provisions, including Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which declares persons holding “offices of the United States” are subject to disqualification from “offices under the United… [read post]
18 May 2014, 4:09 am
Masih, R (on the application of) v Yousaf [2014] EWCA Civ 234 When a notice is served under Section 8 Housing Act 1988, how precise does the wording of the ground(s) under which possession will be sought have to be? [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:59 pm
In Fernandez v. [read post]
