Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 5861 - 5880
of 37,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm
– The Advocate General’s opinion in the Santen referral (C-673/18), a case concerning an SPC based on a second medical use/formulation patent. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 3:11 pm
C. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
Regnier v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:49 am
Of note, at the outset of its analysis, the BCCA stated that in cases that did not involve final determination of a case that originated before the SCC issued Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Waiver of PUA Overpayments State agencies can waive repayment requirements for individuals who mistakenly received overpayment for PUA to which they were not entitled, if the overpayment was not the individual’s fault and such repayment would be contrary to equity and good conscience. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
The most recent, CM Callow Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm
Nur & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2020) EWHC 3526 (Admin) This was (part of) a judicial review of Birmingham’s implementation of its own allocation scheme. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
Other State RIAs. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
[Mother] shall NOT publically state her name, the name of the Child or [Father's] name. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
by Dennis Crouch Caterpillar v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 5:18 am
Johnson, 137 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 8:27 pm
You have also stated that it is sufficient for the purposes of the Patents Act 1990 if the applicant derives title to the invention from the inventor under section 15(1)(c). [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
(The fit between the UK’s ‘worker’ status and EU labour law was discussed in B v Yodel Delivery Case C‑692/19, B v Yodel Delivery (CJEU, Judgment 22 April 2020).) [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
The appeal against a conviction under section 127(2)(c) of the Communications Act 2003 was allowed. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Trade Marks GuestKat Nedim Malovic commented on the CJEU judgment in Ferrari SpA v DU, C–720/18 and C–721/18 concerning the scope of ‘genuine use’ in trade mark law. [read post]
