Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 5861 - 5880 of 6,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
This essay continues their look into the Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 9:40 pm
  An insured may not elect to proceed with a trial by jury when an equitable remedy, such as relief from forfeiture, is sought.Here is the citation: Peters v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 3:48 pm
Posted by Ronnie London and Sarah DuranThe United States District Court for the Western District of Washington(state) has issued a decision in Zango, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:31 am
But now you know which school is Suburban State University, and that my home state is California--not just Sunny Desert State. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:20 am
PLLCNASSAU COUNTYFamily LawEquitable Estoppel Denied in Preventing Respondent From Submitting to DNA TestingMatter of Davis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
" In 2001 the Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:10 pm
" Picking up on the "primary purpose" language of Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
They are a much better team now, losing to Virginia Tech 17-7 last week, but we do not think they will beat Butch Davis and favor the Tar Heels 24-17.Update: To our great surprise, the Pirates won 34-31 on a 39-yard field goal by Ben Hartman as time expired.This week we are : 8-3 in predicting the game winner, 7-4 against the spread.Eastern Michigan (1-11 last year) is a 4.5 underdog to Ball State, who managed to lose their home opener to Miami of Ohio 14-13. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:17 am
§ 1988: In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, * * * the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs * * *The case is Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Kenneth Davis and Jennifer Davis (NFP), a 13-page 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Here, the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the attorney's fee issue, and there is no indication that it considered the parties' resources, economic condition, or other factors that would bear on the reasonableness of the award of attorney's fees. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
"The lawsuit also accuses the association of violating state and federal racketeering laws.The complaint filed August 15 in U.S. [read post]