Search for: "State v. E. F." Results 5861 - 5880 of 8,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
(f)  Develop and implement an action plan, in accordance with the National Security Presidential Memorandum of February 11, 2019 (Protecting the United States Advantage in Artificial Intelligence and Related Critical Technologies) (the NSPM) to protect the advantage of the United States in AI and technology critical to United States economic and national security interests against strategic competitors and foreign adversaries. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Jenelle F., 91 AD3d at 650B51; Matter of Tumari W., 65 AD3d at 1360) , because, in its  opinion, it conflicts with the plain meaning of the statute and is in contravention of its legislative history. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 8:20 pm
The Appellate Division, First Department, answered this question in the negative in Speranza v Repro Lab Inc., 2009 NY Slip Op 01543 (1st Dept. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm by Bexis
Schwarz Pharma, Inc., 586 F.3d 500, 508 (7th Cir. 2009) (affirming a nice discussion at 547 F. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:47 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  “[E]very contract includes an implied covenant that the parties will perform in good faith. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:15 am by Juan C. Antúnez
In the De La Riva case linked below, the 4th DCA provided this short summary of the law as applied to cases where you’re trying to sue an estate: “[I]t is well-settled that ‘an “[e]state” is not an entity that can be a party to litigation. [read post]