Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:13 am
In the case of “Aunt Sally v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
"] From Judge Stephanie Gallagher's opinion Thursday in Cottman v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
She was an employee of Haringey but was also an office holder – appointed to the role of Director of Children’s Services by the Secretary of State. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:41 am
Whatever system they use to calculate fair compensation, Member States are required to maintain a fair balance between those concerned, that is to say, first, the holders of intellectual property rights harmed by the private copying exception, recipients of such compensation, and, secondly, those directly or indirectly liable to pay it.3. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
United States PTO, 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Conflicts of Interest New Item 1603(b) requires the SPAC to disclose any actual or potential material conflict of interest between (1) the sponsor or its affiliates or the SPAC’s officers, directors or promoters, and (2) unaffiliated security holders of the SPAC. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:58 pm
Penguin Group v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am
Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
” All rights in preferred stock provisions, even if considered standard or customary, must be “expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:46 am
Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 4, 2018]. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
o in turizem dd v Bundesminister für Finanzen, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
Holder). [read post]
