Search for: "State v. House" Results 5861 - 5880 of 28,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 3:28 am
In this seminar, Labor Law/Construction Site Accidents in New York, presented by the New York State Bar association on December 9, 2011 Gair discusses section 240(1) cases including Runner v New York Stock Exch., Inc. (13 NY3d 599, [2009]), Salazar v.Novalex Contracting Corp., et al., decided by The Court of Appeals on November 21, 2011, 2011 NY Slip Op 8446 and Wilinski v. 334 East 92nd Housing Development Fund Corp., et al., decided October 25, 2011, 2011 NY… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Phelps, a case about anti-gay funeral protesting; and Bruesewitz v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by Steve
The House Courts of Justice committee passed a bill that would prohibit the use of drones by state or local law enforcement in Virginia until 2014 or 2015. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 5:53 am by Dave
Further, there is no evidence from the council to show that a shorter period than ten years would undermine their stated objectives” ([59]). [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:07 am
There was a sold-out crowd of 80 attendees from cities, counties, PUDs, PDFs, Schools, Ports, Housing Authorities, Parks and even two state agencies. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:07 am
There was a sold-out crowd of 80 attendees from cities, counties, PUDs, PDFs, Schools, Ports, Housing Authorities, Parks and even two state agencies. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
I guess we'll see.]Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” In relation to the fact of the relationship the Court of Appeal rejected the view that this was an exceptional situation under the test set out in the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v. [read post]